niedziela, 23 września 2018

Neo4j LOAD CSV performance testing

Hello everyone!

Since I put my hands on Neo4j graph database, I am going to delve into its performance. I'll start with benchmarking basic operations - including data ingestion.

So, let's copy some tabular data into Neo4j. First step is obviously reading and parsing input files.

In case you don't know - the standard command for reading flat files is LOAD CSV. For example, to load data from tab-separated CSV file and print only 1st and 7th fields, you need to run:

LOAD CSV FROM 'file:///input.txt' AS line
RETURN line[0], line[6];

I decided to test this basic load operator in several variants, checking for possible  factors that *could* have impact on load performance:
  • If input file is compressed or not compressed
  • If WITH HEADERS clause is used or not (each row as hash / dictionary)
  • If the load is followed with a filter (WHERE clause)
  • If the load is follwoed by a simple MATCH rule (which actually does not match any existing paths)

Here are the raw results:

Gzipped Headers Filter Match Runtime#1 Runtime#2 Runtime#3 Runtime#avg CypherCommand
False False False False 13,99 14,70 14,13 14,28 LOAD CSV FROM 'file:///locations.csv' AS csv RETURN count(*)
False False False True 14,26 14,57 14,60 14,48 LOAD CSV FROM 'file:///locations.csv' AS csv MATCH (x:X {x: csv[5]}) RETURN count(*)
False False True False 16,59 16,92 17,06 16,86 LOAD CSV FROM 'file:///locations.csv' AS csv WITH csv WHERE csv[5] IS NOT NULL RETURN count(*)
False False True True 17,81 16,85 18,46 17,71 LOAD CSV FROM 'file:///locations.csv' AS csv WITH csv WHERE csv[5] IS NOT NULL MATCH (x:X {x: csv[5]}) RETURN count(*)
False True False False 22,22 20,53 20,74 21,16 LOAD CSV WITH HEADERS FROM 'file:///locations.csv' AS csv RETURN count(*)
False True False True 20,62 21,08 21,30 21,00 LOAD CSV WITH HEADERS FROM 'file:///locations.csv' AS csv MATCH (x:X {x: csv.city}) RETURN count(*)
False True True False 22,21 22,25 22,69 22,38 LOAD CSV WITH HEADERS FROM 'file:///locations.csv' AS csv WITH csv WHERE csv.city IS NOT NULL RETURN count(*)
False True True True 22,92 22,89 23,27 23,02 LOAD CSV WITH HEADERS FROM 'file:///locations.csv' AS csv WITH csv WHERE csv.city IS NOT NULL MATCH (x:X {x: csv.city}) RETURN count(*)
True False False False 13,85 14,17 14,74 14,25 LOAD CSV FROM 'file:///locations.csv.gz' AS csv RETURN count(*)
True False False True 14,06 14,51 14,87 14,48 LOAD CSV FROM 'file:///locations.csv.gz' AS csv MATCH (x:X {x: csv[5]}) RETURN count(*)
True False True False 16,62 16,66 16,97 16,75 LOAD CSV FROM 'file:///locations.csv.gz' AS csv WITH csv WHERE csv[5] IS NOT NULL RETURN count(*)
True False True True 17,08 16,90 17,41 17,13 LOAD CSV FROM 'file:///locations.csv.gz' AS csv WITH csv WHERE csv[5] IS NOT NULL MATCH (x:X {x: csv[5]}) RETURN count(*)
True True False False 20,31 20,07 20,76 20,38 LOAD CSV WITH HEADERS FROM 'file:///locations.csv.gz' AS csv RETURN count(*)
True True False True 20,78 20,40 21,52 20,90 LOAD CSV WITH HEADERS FROM 'file:///locations.csv.gz' AS csv MATCH (x:X {x: csv.city}) RETURN count(*)
True True True False 22,03 22,03 22,79 22,28 LOAD CSV WITH HEADERS FROM 'file:///locations.csv.gz' AS csv WITH csv WHERE csv.city IS NOT NULL RETURN count(*)
True True True True 22,55 22,65 23,34 22,85 LOAD CSV WITH HEADERS FROM 'file:///locations.csv.gz' AS csv WITH csv WHERE csv.city IS NOT NULL MATCH (x:X {x: csv.city}) RETURN count(*)




Conclusions?

  1. The gzipped input does not affect LOAD performance. Apparently, gzip decompression is so fast it does not affect anything. Gzipped input seems to be marginally faster
  2. The WITH HEADERS option adds significant overhead (40-50%) to the LOAD operation.
  3. The WHERE clause adds a small overhead but it's not so big as WITH HEADERS
  4. The negative MATCH after CSV LOAD is negligible. 

Executive summary:
  • Gzip adds 0% to the cost
  • Negative MATCH adds 1.40% to the cost
  • Simple WHERE adds 18% - 20% to the cost
  • WITH HEADERS option adds 43% - 48% to the cost.


Test conditions:

- default configuration for neo4j
- OS: Ubuntu 18.04
- Linux kernel 4.15
- Oracle Java 8
- Dell E6440 laptop
- Intel i5-4200M CPU
- 4 GB RAM: SODIMM DDR3 Synchronous 1600 MHz (0.6 ns)
- SSD: PLEXTOR PX-128M5

 [23:51:25][filip@lap2:~]$ uname -a
Linux lap2 4.15.0-34-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 27 15:21:48 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[23:51:38][filip@lap2:~]$ java -version
java version "1.8.0_181"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_181-b13)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.181-b13, mixed mode)
[23:51:42][filip@lap2:~]$ LC_ALL=C lscpu
Architecture:        x86_64
CPU op-mode(s):      32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order:          Little Endian
CPU(s):              4
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3
Thread(s) per core:  2
Core(s) per socket:  2
Socket(s):           1
NUMA node(s):        1
Vendor ID:           GenuineIntel
CPU family:          6
Model:               60
Model name:          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4200M CPU @ 2.50GHz
Stepping:            3
CPU MHz:             1313.826
CPU max MHz:         3100.0000
CPU min MHz:         800.0000
BogoMIPS:            4988.50
Virtualization:      VT-x
L1d cache:           32K
L1i cache:           32K
L2 cache:            256K
L3 cache:            3072K
NUMA node0 CPU(s):   0-3
Flags:               fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm cpuid_fault epb invpcid_single pti ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid xsaveopt dtherm ida arat pln pts flush_l1d




Brak komentarzy:

Prześlij komentarz